Federal Register #A-401-809, A-428-843, A-570-996, A-580-872, A-583-851, A-588-872

Commerce Department Maintains Antidumping Duties on Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from Six Countries

This notice details the U.S. Department of Commerce's completion of expedited second sunset reviews of antidumping duty orders on non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) from six countries: - Government Buyer: - U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, Enforcement and Compliance - Products/Scope: - Non-Oriented Electrical Steel (NOES) imported from Sweden, Germany, China, Korea, Taiwan, and Japan - No specific part numbers or quantities provided - OEMs and Vendors: - No specific OEMs or manufacturers named; only countries of origin are referenced - Domestic interested parties: Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel) participated in the review - Key Findings and Requirements: - Revoking antidumping duty orders would likely result in continued or renewed dumping of NOES at significant margins (up to 407.52% for China) - Antidumping duties will remain in place at previously established rates for each country - No procurement of goods or services is solicited or awarded; this is an administrative trade enforcement action - Notable Details: - The review was expedited and completed within 120 days, accounting for a federal government shutdown - No unique performance or delivery requirements are specified - Place of Performance/Administration: - U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230

Description

The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that revoking the antidumping duty orders on non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) from Sweden, Germany, China, Korea, Taiwan, and Japan would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. This notice finalizes the results of the expedited second sunset reviews of these orders, confirming the continuation of antidumping duties at specified rates for each country. The review was conducted following statutory procedures and included input from domestic interested parties but no substantive responses from respondent parties.

View original listing