# DLA Requires Physical Item Marking

DLA RQ017 requires contractors to physically mark items in accordance with the current MIL-STD-130 unless an authorized exclusion applies; identification on packaging alone does not satisfy the requirement. The small screws described in the signal do not qualify for the stated size exemption, and the poster has asked the solicitation point of contact for clarification. Contractors should confirm acceptable marking methods in writing, review posted Q&As, and account for marking labor and handling costs in their bids.

- The requirement applies to the items themselves, so contractors should not assume packaging labels can replace physical marking.
- For small parts, seek written direction on acceptable marking methods and any applicable exclusion before finalizing the bid approach.
- Include the labor and handling associated with marking in cost estimates to avoid underpricing the solicitation response.

**Jurisdictions:** federal
**Industries:** Defense & Military
**Topics:** Regulatory Compliance
**Published:** October 28, 2026

### Government Entities
- Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)
- Department of Defense (DoD)

### Key Quotes
> Be specific in the question: can the part be laser or dot peen marked on this surface, is an ink mark with a cure time acceptable, will they accept marking on the smallest packaging unit carrying the part number plus a certificate of conformance tying it to the lot.
> — Community commenter

### Sources
- [DLA RQ017 – Physical Identification/Bare Item Marking](https://www.reddit.com/r/GovernmentContracting/comments/1xhq0wv/dla_rq017_physical_identificationbare_item_marking) - reddit-governmentcontracting