# BOCC Meeting October 13, 2026


**Body:** PutnamBOCC
**Date:** October 12, 2026
**Jurisdiction:** SLED

**Tags:** Information Technology, Energy & Utilities, Grants & Funding, Digital Infrastructure


The Putnam County Board of County Commissioners meeting on October 13, 2026, approved several procurement- and funding-related actions. The board approved Resolution 2026-076, an intent-to-fund agreement for the county’s ERP financial system replacement, a multi-year project expected to cost more than $1 million. It also approved $178,605 for ERP consulting services to assess current systems and support the forthcoming RFP and proposal review; the expense is expected to be reimbursed through a state legislative appropriation. Separately, commissioners approved a purchase order for $949,861 to the vendor identified in the transcript as Reese/Reason Technologies for design and engineering work integrating a gas takeoff, conditioning, compression, and bottling system at the gasification plant. The county said the purchase is supported by an additional $900,000 award, with Commerce reimbursement and no county cost for overruns. Consent items P and Q for emergency generators serving lift stations and water systems were also approved; officials said grant funding covered the match and balance, but did not state amounts. The Port Authority manager requested that dock rehabilitation be pulled to add an electrical component in coordination with FPL; no action on that project was recorded.

The board also approved funding for a historical marker at Mary Wisham Park from a commissioner’s discretionary funds, with no amount stated. The Chamber of Commerce reported a $65,000 CPTA grant for planning an economic development implementation plan, explicitly not construction, and described six active business projects representing potential—not secured—investment of $545 million. No contract award or purchasing decision was reported for the port dock work. In a separate policy discussion, commissioners directed staff to develop animal-control citation provisions for four categories, including animals at large and improper care, with a graduated fine structure; this was not a procurement action.

**Source:** PutnamBOCC
