Award
Utah State Board of Education USBE-ZC21050-RFP
USBE Multilingual Language Software COOPERATIVE
Recipient
Imagine Learning; Lexia Learning Systems LLC
Awarded
June 02, 2021
Identifier
USBE-ZC21050-RFP
The Utah State Board of Education (USBE) is the government buyer leading a cooperative contracting effort for multilingual language learning software for Local Education Agencies (LEAs) in Utah. The solicitation number is USBE-ZC21050-RFP. The awarded vendors include Imagine Learning and Lexia Learning Systems LLC. The contract is intended to provide multilingual language learning software solutions to support the growing population of multilingual learners in Utah's K-12 educational system. The contract length is five years. The procurement method is a Request for Proposal (RFP) with multiple contract awards anticipated based on meeting score thresholds. The contract includes specialized educational services and information technology software and services related to multilingual language learning. No specific product line items or service line items with quantities or part numbers are listed in the document. The contract requires compliance with Utah Procurement Code and administrative rules, submission of mandatory minimum requirements, technical criteria, and cost proposals. The contract allows for product samples and may include technological upgrades during the contract period. Eligible users include various educational entities in Utah. The place of performance is Utah, with delivery and use by LEAs across the state. The procurement prohibits communication with USBE staff except the procurement officer and requires proposals to be submitted electronically through SciQuest.
Description
The Utah State Board of Education (USBE) awarded contracts for multilingual language learning software for Local Education Agencies (LEAs) in Utah. Imagine Learning and Lexia Learning Systems were awarded contracts for the K-5 grade band. No contracts were awarded for the 6-12 grade band. The contract length is five years. The award was based on evaluation criteria including mandatory minimum requirements, technical criteria, presentations, and cost evaluation.